Gena
Find datasets, shape a small collection in the spreadsheet, or explore notebook workflows for an experiment.
Explore GenaTOOLS FOR COLLEGIATE HACKATHONS
Bring data, language, and practical AI tools into the same student build. TuluAI products can support parts of the journey, from exploring a dataset to sharing a grounded assistant.
Use only the tools that fit your challenge. No single stack is required.
A TOOLKIT, NOT A REQUIRED STACK
Existing TuluAI products cover different parts of a build. Check each product for current access, capabilities, and limitations.
Find datasets, shape a small collection in the spreadsheet, or explore notebook workflows for an experiment.
Explore GenaBuild an assistant around selected source material, such as a website, video, or uploaded files.
Explore KenleExplore conversational AI and test how a project experience works for people using different languages.
Explore PatherleConnect selected services and ask Malple to help carry out clear tasks. Review permissions and results carefully.
Explore MalpleUse trust and safety checks as prompts for further review, not as definitive proof about a claim or media source.
Explore NambikeFind documentation, API access information, and examples for building with the platform.
Build with TuluAIA SIMPLE BUILD PATH
A short sequence can help teams keep the scope clear and make their work easier to evaluate.
Start with a specific person, task, or community need your team can understand.
Use material your team has permission to use, and keep its origin and limits visible.
Connect the smallest useful set of data, product features, and integrations.
Try realistic cases, note what fails, and make the prototype’s limits clear.
FOR ORGANIZERS
Make source permissions, account access, network availability, and compute expectations clear before the event. Encourage teams to test outputs with real examples and explain what their prototypes cannot yet do.
Product capabilities and availability can vary. Trust checks are decision support, not proof; model outputs should be independently reviewed.